To some, 'devolution' might sound like a dry constitutional tweak – another layer of governance, another reshuffling of power.
In reality, it’s actually far more human and ultimately, it’s all about people.
For us in Greater Manchester, devolution has always been about who gets to shape the conditions of everyday life and about enabling those closest to the challenges to also have the power to solve them.
This is what drives us to go further and deeper on our devolution journey.
Facing reality
Back in 2009, the Manchester Independent Economic Review set out two stark truths.
Firstly that if the city-region acted as one joined-up place, it had the potential to help re-balance the UK economy; and secondly, that poor health in the area was holding people back from participating in that growth.
In some of our neighbourhoods, healthy life expectancy still differs by more than a decade and access to employment, housing, green space and opportunity remains uneven.
These problems are one and the same because health and wealth inequalities are deeply intertwined, and physical inactivity is at the heart of it, yet this isn’t a result of personal choice but a product of environment, policy, culture and design work.
Movement and physical activity have often been engineered out of daily life, especially in communities facing the greatest disadvantage.
By 2015, when the first Greater Manchester Moving strategy – Blueprint for Change – was developed, the data was clear.
Where inequality was top level, inactivity was also the highest; and the costs – financial, social and human – were enormous.
A true change of tactics against inactivity
The price of inactivity was at least £27 million a year and far higher if you took into account the cost of long-term conditions, mental health, social isolation and the impact of exclusion.
The response couldn’t be another short-term campaign or an isolated programme. The people of Greater Manchester deserved better.
We needed to reshape the whole system – from transport to planning, from health to education and from workplaces to public spaces.
This meant a shift from blaming individuals for being inactive and unhealthy (indeed 55% of people in our city-region wanted to be more active), to redesigning the conditions that were shaping their behaviour.